The hockey world was shocked today by the news that Toronto Maple Leafs
General Manager Brian Burke had been fired, on the same day the owners
ratified the new Collective Bargaining Agreement, 10 days before the shortened
season is set to start. The fact that he was let go was less shocking than the
timing, as there were rumblings at the end of last season that his job was in
jeopardy after missing the playoffs for all 4 years of his tenure. The
team came under new ownership in August, being purchased by the tandem of
Rogers Communication and Bell Media (the companies that own Sportsnet and TSN).
So why did Brian Burke get fired? There has been all sorts of
speculation today about what exactly happened, one popular conspiracy theory
being that Burke was unwilling to acquire goaltender Roberto Luongo, though
this theory is entirely speculative with no basis in fact. It is entirely
plausible and possible that ownership wants Lou, who won a gold medal for
Canada in the 2010 Olympics; and if Burke had decided and declared that he did
not want to pull the trigger on that trade, it very well could have cost him
his job.
Burkie made some mistakes since taking over the Leafs GM job. The
most often talked about is the trade of 2 first round draft picks for Phil
Kessel, a deal compounded by the fact that the picks turned out to be Tyler
Seguin and Doug Hamilton, two future superstars. Kessel has scored 99 goals in
3 seasons in blue and white, but is also one of the NHL's worst defensive players. Burke also
signed defenseman Mike Komisarek to a 5 year contract for $22M, a move that has
proved to be an albatross. But while he's made some bad moves, he has also
made some great moves (like acquiring Phaneuf and trading Beauchemin for Lupul
and Gardiner).
Besides, if it was poor decision making that got Burke fired, why would
they promote Dave Nonis to replace him? Considering that Dave Nonis was his
right hand man when all those moves were made, his fingerprints are all over
this roster which has repeatedly failed to make the playoffs. Nonis deserves considerable
blame for the team's poor performance, so if it was that performance that led
to Burke's termination, you'd think his best friend Nonis would be out the door
behind him, not taking over the steering wheel.
Personally I don't think that it was bad trades, bad signings, or a
Luongo conspiracy theory that cost Burke his job, I think it was his
personality. This is a man whose relationship with the media can be described
as cantankerous at the best of times. Burkie has what my dad would call
"rabbit ears", in that he seems to read or hear everything that is
written or spoken about him or his team and he has a wickedly short fuse. He is
quick to get pissed off at media members, and once you've crossed Burkie, he is
unlikely to forgive or forget. There's probably half a dozen guys in the Rogers
Sportsnet family who are on Burkie's shit list. It's not a good thing to be
rough with the media when two of the largest media conglomerates in Canada just
bought your team.
Many of us believed that Brian Burke would have one more year to prove
himself, to make the playoffs and ultimately achieve some level of success
before getting axed. Toronto has a decent crop of prospects coming into the
league, chips to move, and a chance of being good. If Burke were fired for
purely performance of the product on the ice, it would likely come at the end
of the season when General Managers are most often cut loose; rather than days
before a compressed season. As one gentleman put it today on television (sorry
I didn't recognize his face or catch his name), they might have wanted to fire
him before he had a chance to save himself. If the Leafs made the playoffs or
even won a playoff round this spring, it would have been more difficult to
justify terminating the boss.
The most likely reason that Burke lost his job is that he frequently
feuds with the hockey media and now his team is owned by the same companies who
employ a substantial chunk of that media. If they fired him because they don't
like his personality, now was the best time to do it. Had it been solely a
matter of product performance, he would have likely received one last chance
and his right hand man would not have his job right now. Nobody believes that
firing Burke will make the team better this season, unless of course he had
decided against the Luongo deal and TSN/Sportsnet wanted Lou at the center of
the hockey universe. The Luongo conspiracy theory becomes more likely if Nonis
trades for him in the next few weeks.
It really looks like Burke got fired because he's a dick. At the press conference Dave Nonis appeared to be partially in shock, like at several moments he was fighting back tears. At times he looked pissed off. Clearly he had no idea until this morning that this move was coming.
Completely agree about timing and reasons were for off-ice not on-ice issues. Consider this, Burkie had a reputation around the league for being a boy scout when it came to CBA stuff. No 20 year contracts, no circumvention, extra days at Christmas for trade freezes etc... Some would argue he put Toronto at a disadvantage. Regardless, the CBA comes out and low and behold - it is exactly what Brian has been complaining about for years. No more long-term contracts, no more circumvention (at least not the same old stuff). Everyone now has to play by Burke's standards. And it is at that exact moment, the exact same day, MLSE cuts him.
ReplyDeleteI agree, it wasn't about performance, it wasn't about losing revenues, it was all about personalities. Maybe the new owners wanted to put their stamp on the team. Most likely they just think he rubs people the wrong way.
Sad part is, in this new CBA era, Burke is the best positioned GM to work within it. Good luck to the next time to snaps him up.