Week nine of the NHL season has been logged into the
history books as we are now 2 weeks into the second quarter of the schedule.
For a full breakdown of the first quarter, check out my First Quarter Report published on Friday, breaking down each of the 32 teams, how me and my
models performed betting their games. This was my best week in a while,
sticking mostly to betting moneylines and pucklines +1.5 goals. Favorites -1.5
continued their downward slide, but didn’t bring me along for the ride. My primary
OU (aka OU Prime) algorithm had a decent week, but a new model on the block
might become my new primary.
Before we go any
further, it’s time for my obligatory *DISCLAIMER* it needs be noted that I’m
not betting with real money. These are all fictional wagers in a spreadsheet.
My mission is to engage in a mass betting campaign, picking a winner of every
single game, every over/under, because it provides a complete dataset for
macroeconomic analysis, which can be shared with you, shedding light on what
worked and what failed. I’m also tracking the results of betting every outcome,
to help me (and you) uncover previously unknown or newly emerging profit
vectors. What started as a thought experiment has evolved into much more.
If you’d like to
read more about the first 3 years of this thought experiment, I wrote a
330-page book outlining the results from every angle. What worked, what failed. Lessons learned, market trends,
team-by-team analysis. To read more, visit the Amazon
store. My blog has been moved to Substack this
season and I’ll be repeatedly encouraging everyone to sign-up for a free
subscription to alleviate my dependence on Twitter for traffic. I’m concerned
that Elon will follow through on his threat to charge everyone for Twitter and
ostensibly destroy his own company. Subscribers receive an email notification
each time a new post is published, and even if Twitter stays free, the
algorithm likes to hide Tweets with links so you don’t leave.
Renovations continue for my betting spreadsheet, and
it might be another two weeks before those are completely finished. The biggest
news was that my Tailing History portfolio received a significant overhaul to
the sample its analyzing. You can read all about it in my Week 10 Preview, but the short version is that it now looks only at the two previous
seasons (tossing the 2021 data because that schedule was fraudulent), it looks
backwards and forward by 7 “days of the season” which will also include the
past 7 days of the current season.
The “Tails” you knew and loved no longer exists. It
was down more than $7,000 on the week by Friday, in a sudden catastrophic
collapse. Frankly, I never expected it to post profit for the entire first
quarter of the schedule, its purpose was to measure the replicability of
history to determine if the data provided in my previews has any relevance. Well,
it did in the first quarter, then fell off a cliff. Is there a lesson to be
learned there? Most of its biggest gains were in week one, then it mostly broke
even for the rest of the quarter. Maybe early in the schedule is the most
replicable, then chaos ensues by December.
I’m completely overhauling how my data is saved,
sorted and displayed. In the past, my historical data from previous seasons was
in a separate worksheet that I would check when there was a hypothesis that
needed testing, but now the historical DB has been merged with the current
season. The new system is far more efficient with less moving parts that can
lead to errors. I’m drawing all my data from the same worksheet. I do need to apologize;
all these renovations are happening so fast that there will be mistakes. Please
just be patient, because this all setting up for a very exciting second half.
There will be extensive error checking needed to
filter out any formulaic mistakes, but the good news is that the old info
summary worksheets were not deleted, the new ones were built from scratch. So
as the new data comes online, I can easily check if it matches the old data. As
I’ve said many times, I’m very paranoid about errors and run regularly
scheduled diagnostic testing to make sure everything is right. The new system
will allow for much faster and easier analysis. I’m also going to have category
charts by day of season that update as soon as new information is added. I’ll
be able to visit a single worksheet that has several charts, and just browse if
there’s any trend data worth sharing.
My Team of
the Week: Anaheim Ducks, +$823
The Anaheim Ducks were one of my bandwagon teams early
in the schedule when they were exceeding expectations, but alas, they have been
regressing to the mean for the last few weeks. This is not a good stage of the
season traditionally for John Gibson, but the offense is also struggling to
score. All my Ducks profit this week was from betting them to lose and unders.
Anaheim is 9-1 in their last 10 and have lost all my confidence, especially
with McTavish and Zegras battling injuries. But losing confidence on one side
does increase confidence in the opposing team. That will continue until it
ceases to be profitable.
The Winnipeg Jets were my second-best team of the
week, mostly from betting them to win and unders. However, they were dealt a
serious blow losing Kyle Connor Sunday night to a knee injury, and their
offense is really going to miss him if the injury is long-term. I’m already
taking San Jose ML tomorrow (Sharks were also among my best teams this week),
and will need a little line value if I’m taking them in Connor’s absence.
Thankfully Winnipeg managed to fight back and win that Ducks game, because I
had a max bet on Jets ML (shared in an email exclusively to my free subscribers
Saturday).
My Worst
Team of the Week: New York Rangers, -$909
The New York Rangers successful western road trip
followed by continued victories without Shesterkin or Fox inflated my
confidence in their ability. That confidence was only reinforced when Igor
returned and played well. Betting the Rangers to win led me down a dark path
marked by red ink. Not only did they lose, they lost be a combined score of
10-2 to the Ottawa Senators and Washington Capitals, who haven’t exactly been
powerhouses lately. That made me feel safe betting Kings to win Sunday, but
that was the game Rangers won. This is a team that often makes me feel stupid
for both betting them to win and lose.
The Tampa Bay Lightning were my second worst team of
the week, thanks mostly to their 4-0 victory against Dallas, who had blown them
out the previous game. That’s the type of situation where I should have known
Vasilevskiy would be back in net on a mission, but hadn’t seen any evidence of
his return to form. Shutting out Dallas is evidence he’s at least capable of
showing flashes of himself. How he sustains that over the rest of the schedule
remains to be seen, but if he’s going to be good, it’s hard to bet a
significant amount of money on a Lightning opponent.
My Week 9 Results
Team By Team Profitability Rankings
These profitability rankings are based on the sum of all my bets per team, including where the money was won or lost. Each week my new Profitability Rankings will be based on all the games in the season, not just what happened this week.
Me vs Myself
No comments:
Post a Comment