Welcome to my Week 16 NHL Betting Report, featuring my
Gambling Power Rankings, results by category, my best bets, and my best/worst
teams to bet on or against. It should be noted that I’m not betting with real
money. These are all fictional wagers in a spreadsheet. If you’re betting with real
money, you should not be betting on every single game, only the games you like
the most. Whereas I’m betting on every game, every over/under, because it
provides a complete dataset for macroeconomic analysis. If you followed my
weekly reports last season, one upgrade is that I’m now logging alt pucklines
for every game, favorites +1.5 goals and underdogs -1.5 goals. Click here to
see my Week 15 Betting Report.
If you’re looking for a big picture commentary on the
last 3 years of hockey betting, you should check out my new book; breaking it down by team, by category, by strategy, by season. There is
plenty of useful information for bettors of all skill levels. It covers
pre-pandemic, peak-pandemic, post-pandemic. What worked, what failed. Lessons
learned, market trends, team-by-team analysis. What impact did the pandemic
have on hockey betting? The market differences between these 3 seasons are
discussed at length, and there's a lot to talk about. To read more, visit
the Amazon
store.
My Weekly Profit: $2,710
My Season Profit: $13,674
The All-star break is just a few days away and my
streak of consecutive losing weeks to start the third quarter has come to an
end. My slump is officially busted! There has been some recent changes to my
methodology, notably to the data feeding my line value algorithms, which were
modified to forget first quarter results, looking only at team win-loss records
since right before American Thanksgiving. The end result was a strong
performance in nearly every major category, aside from road favorites and home
underdogs.
This was my best week betting over/under of the entire
season to date. The new method discussed in my previous Betting Report was the
introduction of a secondary algorithm that counts how many times each team went
over or under that total in their last 7 games. When the new formula agreed
with the old one, I accepted the recommendation 100% of the time. When they
disagreed (or it was 50-50), I looked at the game logs and made a judgement
call (those were 25% of my decisions this week, going 10-3, which may be
unsustainable).
Last All-star break I completed an over/under deep
dive that birthed a new algorithm that closed the season strong. Another deep
dive is planned for the upcoming break, but may simply be a matter of
confirming that what worked the last 2 weeks would have been successful in a
larger sample. If they answer is yes, that’s the end of the deep dive. Granted,
there is no algorithm that can replicate my “judgement calls” so that would be
challenging to appraise over a larger sample, much less extrapolate into an
actionable formula.
At the very least it should be possible to build a set
of guidelines to approximate my judgement calls empirically. A big part of my
decision making process when the two algorithms disagreed was looking at the
game logs and estimating which goalie would be next in the rotation, then
counting how many times the games featuring that gatekeeper went above or below
the total. At the very least converting my judgement into algorithm form will
be an interesting thought exercise. My ability to guess starting goalies is very
well developed from fantasy hockey.
Unders went 25-21-4, improving their performance
despite a small increase in goal scoring. Overs were the second worst category
overall but my 4th best, which makes sense given my 31-15-4 record on over/under.
Unders were a better investment this week, especially on the closing line. In
10 of the first 15 weeks, unders had a higher payout on the opening line,
meaning they were often attracting substantial public investment. That did seem
confusing to me, as my daily Twitter timeline seems to express a strong
preference for overs.
I barely had 3 bad categories to list on my
leaderboard below, aside from the aforementioned road favorites and betting
against back-to-backs (two categories that really delivered for me the second
quarter). This was not a good week to be shorting back-to-backs, which had
delivered a profit on the moneyline in 6 of the last 8 weeks. There were 11
rest advantages and only 5 of them won, including a +195 underdog when San Jose
upset the Penguins in Pittsburgh. Line prices have been getting more expensive
to compensate for the recent trend.
For the first 12 weeks of the season, I was able to generate $1,600 of profit
betting the Florida Panthers to lose, but it seemed like that well had run dry
after the Panthers won 7 of 10 games entering this week. Well my new line value
algorithm wasn’t buying the hype and wanted nothing to do with the Panthers
moneyline for their first 3 games, all of which they lost. Saturday they played
a back-to-back against Boston and managed to upset the Bruins after tying the
game with 3 seconds left. They were 3 seconds away from being my best team of
the week, but at least their 2 comeback goals to win the game cashed my over
bet.
The other teams you wanted to be betting against
this week were St. Louis, Winnipeg, and Calgary. The Blues have lost 6 of their
last 8 games (including against Chicago and Arizona) and just aren’t a team you
should trust either way. They have actually solicited some of my money lately,
but only because of how often they’re listed as a significant underdog. I like
betting the Blues +180 on the road. One team you did not want to bet against
was Anaheim, who has won 4 of their last 5 (though 3 of those wins were against
Arizona and Columbus).
*Note* “Market Return” is based on betting exactly
$100 on every outcome.
This was the best week of the entire season for home
moneyline, winning 66% of their games, banking $523 if you bet $100 on each.
Only getting $523 profit from winning 66% of games does show that the prices
weren’t cheap. This now marks 2 consecutive weeks of me losing money on the
road moneyline, after turning a profit in 7 of the previous 8 weeks. This isn’t
necessarily the start of a new trend, as home teams were favored in 82% of all
the games. That’s substantially above any previous week, meaning good teams
were at home and bad teams were on the road.
This slowly unfolded into an effective week to bet
underdogs +1.5 goals, or -1.5 goals, though dogs did produce a small loss on
the moneyline. It was actually longshots (+200 or higher) that drove this most
recent trend. Chicago, Columbus, and Anaheim all won games as +320 dogs, two of
those hitting -1.5 goals at +750. That’s the only reason that dogs produced a
profit -1.5 goals this week (including a little help from Ottawa +425 vs
Toronto), so don’t count too much on history repeating itself in upcoming
weeks.
I personally bet hardly anything on pucklines this
week. My strong performance was entirely moneyline driven. Part of the reason
for my -1.5 cowardice was getting stung hard by Chicago and Montreal in the
previous 2 weeks. That paranoia proved useful, as favorites -1.5 goals was the
biggest loser overall by a wide margin. Part of the problem was some crazy line
prices if you were betting the worst teams in the league to lose, which was
driving me to take longshot moneyline more often than usual.
My Team of
the Week: New York Islanders, +$724
It was a close and competitive race in my team of week
standings, generating at least $398 profit from 9 different teams with no one
squad representing a disproportionate share of the revenue. The New York
Islanders landed in the top spot after going 2-2. There wasn’t any conscious
strategy or big bets on my part, and I wasn’t even aware of my success until
compiling my report Sunday night. It was the result of a high “shooting
percentage” on mostly small wagers, going 3 for 4 on their unders and betting
the home team in every match (hosts went 4-0).
The Carolina Hurricanes were the next best in my
personal standings, as they won all 3 of their games. I went 3-0 on Canes
moneyline and 3-0 on their over/under. I have managed to officially win back
all the money lost in that disastrous week 13 with the -$1,683
loss. The Canes have won 7 of 9 since going 0-3. They even defeated the mighty
Bruins 4-1 on Sunday, though Boston was on a back-to-back, so might not have
been operating at full speed. I’m on the
Canes bandwagon again, but I’ll be passing when the line price gets a little
too crazy.
My Worst
Team of the Week: Toronto Maple Leafs, -$834
One of my biggest losses of the week was Friday,
placing a large wager on the Toronto moneyline to beat Ottawa. That bet was
made before we found out Auston Matthews wouldn’t be playing. The Sens blew
them out. It makes sense then that those were my worst two teams of the last 7
days. That loss was enough to convince me to lay a little extra on Washington
to beat Toronto on Sunday, which the Leafs won convincingly 5-1. The Matthews
injury led me to overlook the “blowout redemption rule” that they’d come out
flying in the next match.
That one game was the only reason that Ottawa finished
as my second worst team of the week, as I pulled a net profit from their
non-Leaf games. The Sens went 3-0, beating the Islanders, Leafs, and Canadiens.
They were among the best teams if you bet them to win every game, sadly I did
not make that choice often enough, taking Montreal on Saturday because of the
back-to-back which the Sens blew them out. The goaltending has suddenly
tightened up, after being porous for the previous 3 weeks. We’ll see how long
that lasts.
My 3 Best Market
Bets of Week 16: Overall Best Market Bets of Week
16:
1) Under: +$1,081 1)
Longshots moneyline: +$665
2) Home moneyline: +$970 2) Home moneyline: +$523
3) Longshots moneyline: +$660 3) Underdogs +1.5 goals: +$470
My 3 Worst Market
Bets of Week 16: Overall Worst Market Bets of Week
16:
1) Road favorites moneyline: -$448 1)
Favorites -1.5 goals: -$1,114
2) Shorting back-to-backs ML: -$187 2) Overs: -$684
3) Home underdog moneyline: -$65 3) Road moneyline: -$600
My Best Teams To Bet On In Week 16: Overall Best Teams To Bet On:
(over/under/hedges not included) ($100 ML + $100 PL+1.5 + $100 PL-1.5)
1) Tampa Bay Lightning: +$496 1) Anaheim Ducks: +$1,664
2) Carolina Hurricanes: +$459 2) Ottawa Senators: +$983
3) Anaheim Ducks: +$407 3) Chicago Blackhawks: +$600
My Worst Teams To Bet On In Week
16
(over/under/hedges not included)
1) Toronto Maple Leafs, -$384
2) Dallas Stars, -$250
3) Montreal Canadiens, -$200
My Best Teams To Bet Against In Week
16: Overall Best
Teams To Bet Against:
(over/under/hedges not included) ($100 ML + $100 PL+1.5 + $100 PL-1.5)
1) Winnipeg Jets,
+$345 1) St. Louis Blues: +$1,096
2) Montreal Canadiens,
+$330 2)
Winnipeg Jets: +$844
3) Boston Bruins,
+$283 3) Calgary Flames: +$815
My Worst Teams To Bet Against In Week
16:
(over/under/hedges not included)
1) Ottawa Senators, -$600
2) Toronto Maple Leafs, -$350
3) Nashville Predators, -$350
Market’s Best Over/Under Bets In Week
16:
($100 wagers)
1) Florida overs,
+$330
2) Winnipeg unders, +$300
3) Vegas unders, +$273
Team By Team Power
Rankings
My Season Profit: $13,674
My Week 16 Results
2) Home moneyline: +$970 2) Home moneyline: +$523
3) Longshots moneyline: +$660 3) Underdogs +1.5 goals: +$470
2) Shorting back-to-backs ML: -$187 2) Overs: -$684
3) Home underdog moneyline: -$65 3) Road moneyline: -$600
(over/under/hedges not included) ($100 ML + $100 PL+1.5 + $100 PL-1.5)
2) Carolina Hurricanes: +$459 2) Ottawa Senators: +$983
3) Anaheim Ducks: +$407 3) Chicago Blackhawks: +$600
(over/under/hedges not included)
2) Dallas Stars, -$250
3) Montreal Canadiens, -$200
(over/under/hedges not included) ($100 ML + $100 PL+1.5 + $100 PL-1.5)
(over/under/hedges not included)
2) Toronto Maple Leafs, -$350
3) Nashville Predators, -$350
2) Winnipeg unders, +$300
3) Vegas unders, +$273
These power rankings are based on the sum of all my bets per team, including
where the money was won or lost. Each week my new power rankings will be based
on all the games in the season, not just what happened this week.
No comments:
Post a Comment