Welcome to my Week 28 NHL Betting Report, which have some formatting changes for the playoffs. It should be noted that I’m not betting with real money. These are all fictional wagers in a spreadsheet. If you’re betting with real money, you should not be betting on every game, only the games you like the most. Whereas I’m betting on every game, every over/under, because it provides a complete dataset for macroeconomic analysis. Click here to see my Week 27 Betting Report.
The playoffs started last Monday, which was day 1 of week 28, so this report covers the first seven days of round 1, summarizing 28 games. It was a losing week for me, as I struggled with 3 series in particular, which you can read about below. Definitely the big winners through 7 days were home teams (moneyline & puckline), overs, and “zig zags” (laying money on the loser of the previous game). I even wrote a Tweet before the playoffs explaining it as a popular strategy in past years that yielded negative returns in 2021. They came roaring back in 2022, with a 65% winning percentage thus far. If you bet $100 on each, you’re up $593.
In past NHL playoffs, zig zag betting has been a viable strategy, betting the loser of the previous game. But it was a losing wager in the 2021 playoffs, as the team who lost the previous game won the next game only 43% of the time. š§ #NHLBetting https://t.co/auUuWWMakB
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) April 29, 2022
I’m not sure precisely what science is behind that
phenomenon, but it seems to be tied to motivation/desperation. If you win,
you’re more comfortable the next night, whereas if you fall behind, there’s
more anxiety and adrenaline. There is more pressure on you to win, and while
some teams can and do fold under those conditions, others increase their
effort. The catch is, you’d think every player would give 100% effort in every
playoff game. Giving it 110% is not physically possible. It feels more
plausible that winners get too comfortable or complacent.
2) Zig zag bets ML+PL: +$500 2) Zig zag moneyline: +$593
3) Boston/Carolina over: +$493 3) Overs: +$564
2) Road underdogs +1.5 goals: -$422 2) Road moneyline: -$638
3) Carolina to win ML+PL: -$350 3) Road underdogs +1.5 goals: -$576
My Week 28 Results
*Note* “Market Return” is based on betting exactly $100 on every outcome.
I had concerns about how my over/under algorithm would perform in the first round of the playoffs when it was still relying on regular season data. For the first few days of the playoffs, I decided to reduce O/U bet size to $100 each, instead of increasing to $200 on the games it liked the most. It quickly became clear that goal scoring was not down at all, and we can proceed full-steam ahead using regular season data. By game 6 of round 1, it will be using entirely playoff-based data.
Overs had a strong week to finish the #NHLBetting regular season, but I'm expecting a drop in goal scoring in the playoffs. Last year there was a 5% drop from the last 3 weeks to round 1. š
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) May 2, 2022
For more market analysis #GamblingTwitter click here:šhttps://t.co/SiFjEvrdgo
The algorithm was mostly revenue neutral for the first 7 days, making $19 in profit. Through the first 16 games, over/unders were 8-8 with both sides losing money if you bet them every game. I even Tweeted that stat at that moment, and by the end of the first week, they were 18-10.
Three games into this series, the Dallas Stars are leading the massively favored Flames 2 games to 1. The Stars covered +1.5 goals in all 3 games, a bet that I was on early because the Flames lines were uncomfortably expensive. This has been the lowest scoring series thus far, with unders going 2-1 (but would have been 3-0 without the empty net goal with 1 second remaining in game 3). My bets in this series are 5-1. I’ve got Stars at home in game 4, which is boldly going against the zig zag, but road zags aren’t faring as well.
The Dallas Stars +1.5 goals are 3-0 in the playoffs. I was on that bet early, but only because the Calgary lines were uncomfortably expensive. š° #NHLBetting
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) May 8, 2022
I certainly didn't enter the playoffs thinking "the Stars got this"...
Toronto vs Tampa: +$161
If you set the betting line using only Tampa road losing % vs playoff teams in the regular season and Toronto home win % vs playoff teams; the Leafs moneyline would be -220 tonight. It's currently -135 (bet $135 to win $100). #BettingTips
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) May 4, 2022
I'm assuming the betting public has a ton of money on Colorado tonight, and that Connor Ingram just stole a small fortune in puckline wagers. š♂️ #NHLBetting
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) May 6, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment