The advantage to my method is the volume of lessons learned which I can write about and share with people. If greed was my driving force, I'd be more reluctant to share winning strategies. The more people who bet an angle, the more books compensate. I'm happy sharing everything.
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) October 6, 2022
My Week 1 Profit: $977
In the last 3 seasons over the first 30 days, the Anaheim Ducks covered +1.5 goals in 26 of John Gibson's 33 starts. 🧐 #BettingTips
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) October 12, 2022
Granted, week 1 over/under betting was not a struggle last season, as I produced a 10% rate of return, achieved without an algorithm. Educated guesses worked. This was on pace to be a terrible O/U week, and the pessimistic recap that I wrote Friday night in the first draft of this report had to be re-edited Sunday. My algorithms will be consulted in week 2 to help me get a feel, but won’t be trusted until week 3 or 4. The algorithms that I use to determine appropriate line value on moneylines and pucklines probably won’t be heeded much for a couple more weeks, while teams build up a sufficient sample of both home and road games.
In the first 2 weeks of the last 3 NHL seasons, home teams won 57% of games. If you bet $100 on each, you won $1,100. Home favorites were victorious 64% of the time and betting $100 on each netted $1,582. 💰 #BettingTips
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) October 13, 2022
Another thing that I’ll be tracking for the entire schedule is closing lines, and sharing observations as they are observed. This was something I tried for the final 600 games of 2021/22, which yielded some interesting results that you can read about in my new hockey betting book that will be available in the Amazon store on November 3rd. More on that to come.
My Week 1 Results
*Note* “Market Return” is based on betting exactly
$100 on every outcome.
Home teams got out to fast start, dominating the categories for most of the week until getting clawed back on Friday and Saturday when home underdogs went 1-4. Home favorites -1.5 goals on the puckline did hold strong, as 79% of home favorites who won the game also covered -1.5 goals. It was different for me, with a higher rate of return on the home fave moneyline than -1.5 goals, but only because Jack Eichel couldn’t hit an empty net. If he had, my rate of return on home faves -1.5 goals would have been 73%, for a net profit of $2,000 (which would have made it my best category by far).
The week featured 9 games with a rest advantage vs tired opponents, and if you bet $100 on all of them -1.5 goals (including underdogs), you banked an impressive $880. Funny that the best category was actually my worst, thanks to Vegas failing to cover against Chicago (costing me -$1,000). Whereas I had a very strong return (27%) shorting back-to-backs on the moneyline. As you can read in my book coming soon, betting against back-to-backs produced a fantastic return for me last season. My concern is that oddsmakers also have that data and can adjust their lines accordingly (which has already begun).
Curiously, road moneyline was my second best category but was actually the worst overall if you bet $100 on each. Part of the explanation is that I only bet 6 of them, winning 5, and they were mostly good teams (aside from Chicago vs San Jose). Whereas it was mostly road underdogs who sank the category as a whole, losing -$750 while road faves lost only -$27. My other road moneyline wins were Vegas vs LA, Tampa vs Columbus, Carolina vs San Jose, and Calgary vs Edmonton, so it’s not like I was taking big risks on road moneyline.
I hedged 20% of my projected Calgary winnings with the Oilers live moneyline at +700. If Calgary holds on, I win $100. If they lose, I still profit $75. My bet on the over is already a winner.
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) October 16, 2022
My Team of the Week: Colorado Avalanche, +$686
Note to self: Arizona, Montreal, Chicago, and Philadelphia are a combined 2-19 in the NHL preseason... 😬 #NHLBetting
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) October 8, 2022
Let Tankapalooza begin! 🥳💰
My Worst Team of the Week: Vegas Golden Knights, -$910
The Chicago Blackhawks visiting Las Vegas after chasing the speedy Colorado Avalanche around the ice at high altitude the night before felt like easy money. Maybe going from high to low altitude gave them an oxygen boost. I’m not precisely sure what happened. The Golden Knights were a Jack Eichel empty net goal away from being my best team of the week, but alas he missed. The only reason that the game came down to the final minutes is because Chicago goaltender Alex Stalock decided to be a hero, stopping 36 of 37 shots. I wagered my maximum amount of $1,000 on that puckline, which I had stopped doing entirely after January last season. I hit the -1.5 puckline jackpot betting against Arizona last October, so followed the same blueprint. I’m not pumping the brakes on shorting Chicago, but easing my foot off the gas pedal slightly.
Note to self: Bet Minnesota Wild overs, at least until Marc-Andre Fleury finds a groove. 💰 #BettingTips
— Hockey Economist (@Hockeconomics) October 16, 2022
(it's also plausible Father Time has finally closed the gap on the Flower)
2) Road moneyline: +$608 2) Home favorites -1.5 goals: +$807
3) Home moneyline: +$563 3) Heavy favorites -1.5 goals: +$347
2) Road favorites -1.5 goals: -$375 2) Road moneyline: -$777
3) Under: -$202 3) Road underdogs +1.5 goals: -$725
(over/under not included) ($100 ML + $100 PL+1.5 + $100 PL-1.5)
2) Pittsburgh Penguins: +$577 2) Detroit Red Wings: +$750
3) Winnipeg Jets: +$435 3) Boston Bruins: +$587
(over/under not included)
2) Minnesota Wild, -$350
3) Los Angeles Kings, -$250
(over/under not included) ($100 ML + $100 PL+1.5 + $100 PL-1.5)
(over/under not included)
2) Detroit Red Wings, -$250
3) Seattle Kraken, -$224
2) Carolina unders, +$186
3) Anaheim overs, +$183
Team By Team Power
Rankings
These power rankings are based on the sum of all my bets per team, including
where the money was won or lost. Each week my new power rankings will be based
on all the games in the season, not just what happened this week.
No comments:
Post a Comment